From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jun 26 07:40:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0661598CB67 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B831165 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by wgqq4 with SMTP id q4so81246557wgq.1 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=N2eaQ0GxqfR2BvdbfYQzPryRxDTOKDdGSPkGvDN3NSM=; b=dO6jsF1sQE1gIR7NVjvrWwctMMAVsvh+l2FfniVJmIqzX9TLFF6KrFyrc11dgQlAac o4wUOCSe/YggOw1gtlZeg3FkYa4uxTnUXl6K0aHMCuFBVMQw6XGTkk4wVM1Rablpm4B5 jHfX3EzNPPgAnDOK2eXAul3e3r79Mna/z0djixAJJvRs7yWdiU+9i4e+ynKSIuMsd0fF 3+lUy8u4gCQS1LDPSz8HFcFBpYgP1xCAVvpoDrFOTHTTAXUxMy4IGaD/f8mdgTpYvvwa NWnxW3hQTgb7vRm03VmB2o7FDKIc6REIzVUo85QpMlZWNfh59jWacb2Oc/O+TVjfxOtJ gIlw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.109.97 with SMTP id hr1mr498596wjb.95.1435304428958; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.73.5 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com> References: <558B3F60.7060809@sneakertech.com> <558B41A3.1050506@gmail.com> <558B45C1.3040101@sneakertech.com> <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com> <20150625065727.e728118a09a939f408ec8526@sohara.org> <558C4756.1030805@gmail.com> <20150625202835.62d37aed@gumby.homeunix.com> <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:40:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any utils worth installing a GUI on a server for? From: krad To: jd1008 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:40:31 -0000 zfsonlin is a kernel module these days so the speed differences in theory shouldnt be great. However I'm not sure what the reality is these days as the project isnt quite as mature as freebsd's yet On 25 June 2015 at 21:05, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/25/2015 01:28 PM, RW via freebsd-questions wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:24:22 -0600 >> jd1008 wrote: >> >> I have not used Sun's ZFS, so was not familiar with it. >>> Found an interesting evaluation of it at >>> http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/05/26/zfs-raid-levels/ >>> >> FWIW ZFS has been a mainstream FreeBSD feature for some time now. It's >> licence allowed the SUN code to run in the FreeBSD kernel whereas >> Linux had to recreate it, or adapt the original version to run in >> userland. >> > Yes - the 'fuse' land. > I would love to see io performance differences between the > FreeBSD implementation vs the linux implementation. > I gamble that running zfs in the kernel might provide faster i/o > but not sure how much faster. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >