From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 10 14:49:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03382 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:49:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03337 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:49:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id PAA23456; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 15:46:29 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 15:46:29 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199802102246.PAA23456@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Doug White cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI code being improved Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.questions In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-971204 (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article you wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Cliff Addy wrote: > >> I'm just curious if the SCSI code in FreeBSD is being worked on. There >> are lots of messages here about the infamous "bus reset" lockup. I know >> that I can count on at least one of our servers locking up every day >> because of it. >> >> It's just so out of character for FreeBSD. Everything else is just >> fabulous, but this one part has had so many problems. And to more explicitly answer your question, yes. There is work in progress to completely replace the current SCSI system with something more robust. Search the SCSI list archives at www.FreeBSD.org for "CAM", or take a peek at: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/cam/README -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe questions" in the body of the message