From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 03:38:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C80719E; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lichray@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A1A76A; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id fs13so1953983lab.8 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:38:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=d2a6KnzyRTyBhxUM6S00vLqwf+jhFtSY/0/IZoIJDfY=; b=j9+CKDbM03mkUuuNGp9w3LJfcIxWbgGn8bKhsELb85Xkqijk2em7PrfdkMyAN6hvWp WKSPoS7jrWij4d1anKklGvGzE5u/8ZNFgOpAOWljEVQ149Y5aqv/Kvqns/Ess2/BW/O7 GXf0T5B9C9IA+vbLk3NzWGIOkflyfOqWgkeELtTFaURUeGy5t3IJ1iDM0TJ1y2ePtCq5 ZsFNc6VFxFLYcjfvsLFEhNBn1o1XAohH3d0UWde3/B2RXWxIIBDi3rAcG/cyi5XIb31L 9jkn8p/P1nt+ikJHkp7VDhEUx2jS8whIpv+rXFAjytri+BNqAE4V6sDtiA3vaNsDp2kN 9LlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.105.17 with SMTP id gi17mr7043573lab.46.1358912303643; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.75.131 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:38:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201301230335.r0N3Z7wG031521@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201301230335.r0N3Z7wG031521@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:38:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports/173590: New ports: textproc/fcitx-m17n and vietnamese/fcitx-unikey, libm17n and unikey support for Fcitx From: Zhihao Yuan To: linimon@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Wen Heping , freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:38:26 -0000 On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:35 PM, wrote: > It appears that the first of these two ports was committed, but not the > other? Because wen@ says that the fcitx-unikey port contains a pkg-plist bug, but we did not get a chance to contact and to address the problem... -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/