From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 14:29:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E32416A407; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7D843D49; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOETPbw045395; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:29:25 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAOETPJw045394; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:29:25 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:29:25 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20061124142925.GA44939@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20061121165151.0dd0956c.dom@helenmarks.co.uk> <20061124040223.9AA9A45054@ptavv.es.net> <20061124092027.a310a6e1.dom@helenmarks.co.uk> <20061124141736.F90666@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061124141736.F90666@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dominic Marks Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2-PRE panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:29:31 -0000 On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:18:22PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > Is there an open PR on this problem currently? I'm in the process of > reviewing my outstanding network PRs for 6.2 and I'm having trouble > tracking down all the pieces of this report. Has GNATS been fixed? I mean its search (by ID or single line fields). Eugene Grosbein