Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:12:20 -0700 From: "Rudy (bulk)" <crapsh@monkeybrains.net> To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Cc: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available Message-ID: <50612F24.7020008@monkeybrains.net> In-Reply-To: <20120925104915.6aa98b88@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <5060884C.3050709@monkeybrains.net> <CAFMmRNzUbiSKhLxiFx-fLrw7LWJ-7h921oaOk-V2ekbSb0TpFg@mail.gmail.com> <50611FAE.7060809@monkeybrains.net> <20120925104915.6aa98b88@X220.ovitrap.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/24/12 8:49 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:06:22 -0700 > "Rudy (bulk)" <crapsh@monkeybrains.net> wrote: > >> Checking all the interfaces, there are a lot more drops/Ierrs on >> em2... The igb devices (PCIe card) seem a lot better than the >> Supermicro motherboard em devices. Is this an on-board vs mb thing, >> or em vs igb thing? >> > I hardly notice drops on the em interface connection to locally > connected machines. I ordered a replacement system with ix and igb on the motherboard. I'm pointing my finger at the motherboard em (and my inability to properly tune it). http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/1026/SYS-1026T-6RF_.cfm Rudy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50612F24.7020008>