From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 8 21:10:26 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B9237B400; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 21:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g394AKi94734; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:10:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g394AJc26597; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:10:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 22:10:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020408.221017.117026133.imp@village.org> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys ioccom.h From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020408210151.B18407@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020408205017.A18187@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020408210151.B18407@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020408210151.B18407@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway writes: : It was broken by r1.11 of ioccom.h as stated, AFAICT. gcc apparently : treats ioctl() and (ioctl)() as different prototypes. The standards nazi's told me that this was the proper way to define something that might be a macro. Why isn't that the case? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message