From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 6 17:11:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (law-f235.hotmail.com [209.185.130.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D044437B62F for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 17:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zak107@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 37426 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2000 00:11:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20000507001117.37425.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 62.0.131.11 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sat, 06 May 2000 17:11:17 PDT X-Originating-IP: [62.0.131.11] From: "Falsch Fillet" To: jasone@canonware.com, dick@seaman.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multithreaded server performance Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 17:11:17 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >I have run threaded tests on Solaris with over 30,000 connections without >problems, other than kernel deadlock due to resource starvation when >stuffing too many kernel-side socket buffers with data. > Well there's your solution then. With Solaris you can multiplex hundreds/thousands of user threads to a couple of LWP's, depending on your load and target architecture/configuration. Regarding FreeBSD's model - will this become something similar to Solaris/UnixWare's LWP model, or retain a clean libc_r/rfork separation? Cheers, Alex. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message