Date: 13 Mar 2001 22:42:55 +0100 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@poboxes.com> To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port naming convention (was Re: isc-dhcp3) Message-ID: <elw1qra8.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:19:47 %2B0900" References: <200103130235.f2D2Z7I04680@gits.dyndns.org> <86u24x4upo.wl@cheerful.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> writes: > At Tue, 13 Mar 2001 03:35:07 +0100 (CET), > Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > all my installed ports, I'm discovering that some ports where > > renamed from xxx to xxxY such as acroread -> acroread4, > > mod_php -> mod_php4, etc. so, I'm asking you. what is the rule ! > > $ cd /usr/ports/print/acroread4 && make package-name > acroread-4.05 from my port tree updated yesterday : # make package-name acroread4-4.05 > $ cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 && make package-name > php4-4.0.4pl1 while mod_php4 has been named mod_php in the past. > Definately acroread4 is good and php4 is bad example. > > I repeat once again. port directory and package name need not to sync. > > net/isc-dhcp2 makes isc-dhcp-2.0.5.tgz and > net/isc-dhcp3 makes isc-dhcp-3.0.b2.18.tgz. > > What is the problem? not a problem for me, but accordingly to David, this permit to just do pkg_add -r isc-dhcp3 (or something like that) while pkg_add -r isc-dhcp clash between both versions. Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@poboxes.com UNIX is user-friendly; it's just particular work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr about who it chooses to be friends with. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?elw1qra8.fsf>