From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 28 08:07:01 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9618016A412
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:07:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it)
Received: from mail.cedoc.mo.it (ip-147-100.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.147.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82343CC6
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:06:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it)
Received: from mail.cedoc.mo.it (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cedoc.mo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1A56420;
	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:04:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from intanto (intanto.cedoc.mo.it [172.16.1.72])
	by mail.cedoc.mo.it (Postfix) with SMTP id ED0C656415;
	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:04:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:06:48 +0100
From: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Message-Id: <20061128090648.d58eb6ae.massimo@cedoc.mo.it>
In-Reply-To: <200611272136.kARLaMeG029740@lava.sentex.ca>
References: <4557CECD.2000609@samsco.org>
	<200611130158.kAD1wdKE040908@lava.sentex.ca>
	<4557EF13.9060305@samsco.org>
	<200611130454.kAD4sZwe041556@lava.sentex.ca>
	<4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org>
	<200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca>
	<4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org>
	<200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca>
	<7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net>
	<200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca>
	<20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca>
	<1164356894.4306.1.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
	<200611272136.kARLaMeG029740@lava.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE  patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:07:01 -0000

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:36:34 -0500
Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote:

> OK, I added OpenBSD to the mix as well.  Results are pretty crappy 
> with the base default install. With one stream, the box essentially 
> live locks. This was just with the stock kernels from the CD.  The 
> PCIe bge nics dont work, so I cant test those.  I had a look at their 
> errata page and there seems to be some updates to those 2 nics so if 
> there is interest I can try compiling in those fixes and re-testing

FWIW I would definitively like to see it. But thanks for going so far..


--
Massimo