From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 4 19:28:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0002137B41B; Sat, 4 May 2002 19:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g452SLPp090059; Sat, 4 May 2002 19:28:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by master.gorean.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g452SKrG000878; Sat, 4 May 2002 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: John Baldwin , Subject: Re: xdm broken on current In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020504192730.V873-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > That's right, I'd forgotten - the old PAM modules don't like > libc.so.5. Not much I can do about that :( I'm afraid you'll have to > rebuild X. Then I'm back to my original point. I think that breaking binary compatibility for all 4.x pam applications is a very bad idea. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message