From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Nov 15 12:27:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA13796
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 12:27:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rk.wbs.com ([205.136.189.25])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA13791
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 12:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rashid@localhost) by rk.wbs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA20227; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:24:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Rashid  Karimov <rashid@rk.wbs.com>
Message-Id: <199611152024.PAA20227@rk.wbs.com>
Subject: Re: Pentium Pro
To: mdb055s@cnas.smsu.edu (Byrd Michael D)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:24:18 -0500 (EST)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.961115104833.28674D-100000@cnas.smsu.edu> from "Byrd Michael D" at Nov 15, 96 10:51:09 am
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

		If you want to jump (and balance there) right on 
		the bleeding edge - I think there're already SMP
		kernels. 
		I would think that SMP development branch is something
		quite different from what we have for regular users and it
		would take a lots of efforts to get it ? :)

		Unfortunately in the latest "State of The FreeBSD UniXon"
		Jordan didn't address the SMP issues ... IS it safe to 
		assume that 3.* branch will incorporate SMP as native
		feature ?
> 
> Will FreeBSD run on a Micron Millenia Pro2 with two Pentium Pro 180 
> procesors and 64 Mb RAM?
> 
> 	--Michael Byrd