From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:01:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A6A106564A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackoroses@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6787A8FC1A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so735183wwf.31 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=02YGjT0KquO+vxAmbwj/CHftGDBSL8gpqAN4Fu8xbzY=; b=qpqAm7QnCTzTlucCoCKL74kMtjqFWxSa09uPRRphIbxVUFXkTPvcAQJY02wzs59rsl 0hCim0W8m3QqFvimsszv0BoxIbwVKx8POnO1ktRkEou4TPwgsuoz8TvziNrueCXW2K9e z27M5Ge+F2vZC9XMpOEtnbEe3t6q/+ZTJ7EZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=N5p6JwyRDKWnOh4kGSUIvZfTUR/JsoZsZpmY9VEz+b2bV3xTRMMP1nv+DmjACIfS/7 B1erLoaZDK1jRCK0bNYiDQZ1l1uychksJOIGCEfewl4YgI6IWCqyXLIOuE+8dWvT60/5 yhStOed8mSkakEKy851OdxECAXIYED0kH0ZrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.2 with SMTP id d2mr626677wbt.91.1292600199833; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.132.138 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:36:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Mike L To: security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackoroses@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:57 -0000 Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official > response about this. Please have a look at: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html > > Regards, > Giorgos > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov < > fullblaststorm@gmail.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Victor Lyapunov > > Date: 2010/12/15 > > Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? > > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > > > Hi folks, > > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > > code. > > > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > > of this? > > > > Thanks, > > Victor Lyapunov. >