From owner-freebsd-config Thu Apr 23 14:04:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA25250 for freebsd-config-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:04:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA25243 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA02200; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:04:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC cc: config@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Config Databases In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:45:45 MDT." <199804232045.OAA22676@xmission.xmission.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:04:01 -0700 Message-ID: <2195.893365441@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I see what you're saying. ENOENT, EPERM, EROFS where they make sense, > and ESCREWED (well, EIO) for everything else? ;^) No, ENOTHING. As I said, the operations should just silently "succeed" in the cases where the user has attempted to do a bonehead file operation but not reflect the change. "Never check for an error condition you don't know how to handle." :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-config" in the body of the message