From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Dec 10 21:17:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA16205 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:17:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA16193; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:17:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0zoKwx-00018I-00; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:17:11 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA66364; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:16:04 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199812110516.WAA66364@harmony.village.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP : laptop power-down change To: Mike Smith , current@FreeBSD.ORG, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:06:08 MST." <199812110106.SAA65223@harmony.village.org> References: <199812110106.SAA65223@harmony.village.org> <199812102352.PAA01072@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:16:04 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org : Why the change? The current behavior seems right to me. Actually, rather than argue this into the ground, would you object to my implementing a options APM_MAP_HALT_TO_POWER_OFF and checking it in to apm.c and LINT? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message