Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:34:53 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [releng_8_2 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc Message-ID: <201202030834.54072.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2B278A.3080502@m5p.com> References: <201202022037.q12Kb66S041860@freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca> <4F2B278A.3080502@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:17:14 pm George Mitchell wrote: > On 02/02/12 15:37, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > > [... one of three errors it's been reporting repeatedly for days ...] > Talk about a lack of focus! Apparently two or three people have all > recently checked in code without first verifying that it compiled (let > alone ran), or else possibly did not completely commit their changes, > and then absconded to a place where they fail to receive these emails > about the problems. Can someone please either diagnose these errors or > else revert the deficient commits? -- George Mitchell No, it is more that the tinderbox for 8 wasn't actually checking these kernels before (they have been broken since 8.1 and 8.2 were released) and they are on less-used platforms. I do agree it needs to be cleaned up one way or another. Given the reticence to commit changes to release branches, it is probably simpler to mask this via the tinderbox instead. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202030834.54072.jhb>