From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 27 19:44:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA27331
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.via.net (ns.via.net [140.174.204.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA27316
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from joe@localhost) by ns.via.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id TAA03879 for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:44:17 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:44:17 -0700
From: Joe McGuckin <joe@ns.via.net>
Message-Id: <199606280244.TAA03879@ns.via.net>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Frame relay and ATM support: virtual interface per vpi?
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

One feature I'd like to see is 'sub-interfaces' on a per VC basis. I'd like
to see traffic counts/statistics per VC - not just for the hardware interface.