Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:38:59 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ghostscript-afpl vs ghostscript-gnu Message-ID: <20040215213859.GA56967@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402151518500.8830-100000@pancho> References: <20040215203341.GC53260@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402151518500.8830-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Eww, how did this superfluous variable get into bsd.port.mk? You're > > supposed to use GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT to specify which of the n ghostscript > > ports you want to use. >=20 > As ports/36112, which was originally someone else's PR, but one > on which you had commented "this patch needs to be reworked for > the current bsd.port.mk" which I then did. See audit log for > details. You've got my permission to change it if you hate it. >=20 It looks like the WITH_cruft appeared in the audit trail at a later point. Actually I think some of my responses to Jens were not recorded in the audit trail either. Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAL+bzWry0BWjoQKURAiRIAJ9k55bsrqdkzPhBS80abVdJiAUgTACgze/0 K3IkqxlJvmrxO7XPxn5R8mY= =jqnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040215213859.GA56967>