Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:38:29 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ldconfig when PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES (and linux ports) Message-ID: <20070803233829.GA71909@rot26.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <86849396@bsam.ru> References: <52921778@bsam.ru> <1186178328.46188.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <86849396@bsam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:09:47AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:58:47 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Boris Samorodov p????e v so 04. 08. 2007 v 01:30 +0400: > > > > Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package > > > cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1] > > > > > > To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux > > > ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a > > > package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I > > > don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped > > > when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both > > > for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port change. > > > I don't follow - what is the problem? > > An FC6 port can't be build (and more specific -- linux-fc6 ldconfig > doesn't run) with current default compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2. So > this sysctl should be changed to 2.6.16 for package building sake. > When the default compat.linux.osrelease will be switched to 2.6.16 we > will get the other way round problem if we try to build and FC4 port. > > I don't like the status quo and want to find a way to siplify it. That's a kernel problem, not a ldconfig problem. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070803233829.GA71909>