From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Nov 12 18:07:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D3AA2D88F for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA4D1C71; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwHl-0009Bm-9A; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:07:49 +0300 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:07:49 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Allan Jude Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <20151112180749.GX31314@zxy.spb.ru> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5643B3EB.1040002@FreeBSD.org> <20151112000651.GH48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5644C937.6030103@freebsd.org> <20151112174437.GJ48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5644D1A2.6010305@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5644D1A2.6010305@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:07:51 -0000 On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:51:30PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2015-11-12 12:44, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > > > >> On 2015-11-11 19:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >>>>> I would also like to remove the NONE cipher > >>>>> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in > >>>>> base). > >>>> > >>>> Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no > >>>> complaints. It was just reported and fixed upstream in the last day and > >>>> I wrote in a similar fix in the port. That speaks a lot about its usage > >>>> in the port currently. > >>> > >>> I am try using NPH/NONE with base ssh and confused: don't see > >>> performance rise, too complex to enable and too complex for use. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >> > >> I did a few quick (and dirty) benchmarks and it shows that the NONE > >> cipher definitely makes a difference. Version of OpenSSL also seems to > >> make a difference, as one might expect. > >> > >> Note: openssh from ports seems to link against both base and ports > >> libcrypto, I am still trying to make sure this isn't corrupting my > >> benchmark results. > >> > >> I am still debugging my dummynet setup to be able to prove that HPN > >> makes a difference (but it does). > >> > >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/SSHPerf > > > > I see you test NONE only on OpenSSH_7.1p1/1.0.2d. > > I am try OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p (both side) > > I am got about 500Mbit/s. > > For OpenSSH_6.6.1p1/NONE I am got abot same. > > > > I am don't see this combination in you table (OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p ix0 OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p) > > > > If NONE is actually being used, big warnings will be printed to your screen: > > WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER > WARNING: ENABLED NONE CIPHER > > If you don't see this, NONE is not being used. I am see this, of couse.