From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 8 19:31:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B6816A419 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6373613C478 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2068F4711C; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:31:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:31:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Matthew Dillon In-Reply-To: <200801081810.m08IA3mY040575@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: <20080108192858.B26471@fledge.watson.org> References: <200801012116.m01LGQhN012860@bonkers.video-collage.com> <200801032334.m03NY7Zd019292@apollo.backplane.com> <863at97ntr.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200801072211.m07MBcb3032223@apollo.backplane.com> <86d4scr86d.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200801081810.m08IA3mY040575@apollo.backplane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Mikhail Teterin , =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= , current@freebsd.org, efinleywork@efinley.com Subject: Re: a new way to hang 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:31:39 -0000 On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Matthew Dillon writes: > :> [snip] > : > :The arrogance you display in your response is simply staggering. I > :should have known better than to engage in any kind of conversation with > :you... > : > :DES > > The arrogance you display in your posting is simply staggering. I > should have known better then to reply to it. > > What the hell kind of answer did you expect, DES? I think this thread fell below a reasonable usefulness threshold several posts ago, and I suggest the participants resolve their further differences via private e-mail rather than on the public mailing lists. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge