From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 15 08:47:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FE11065675; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.246.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FFE8FC1C; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from parancell.ongs.co.jp (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.246.94]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9E9C125424; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:47:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4A5D97B3.6080108@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:47:47 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rene Ladan References: <4A5C5F13.7030607@FreeBSD.org> <4A5D5ED7.5000101@freebsd.org> <4A5D8630.2080408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tom Rhodes , "doc@FreeBSD.org" , Gabor PALI , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a VirtualBox section to Handbook's 'Virtualization' chapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:47:49 -0000 Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/7/15 Manolis Kiagias : >> Daichi GOTO wrote: >>> Great work! thanks, >>> and I have a little suggestion. How about to revert the paragraphs? >>> >>> VirtualBox is an actively developed, .... >>> >>> For a number of years, FreeBSD was not officially supported as.... >>> >>> How does that sound? >>> >> Thanks! >> >> I feel that since the heading is "FreeBSD as a Host OS" it would be >> better to start the discussion with a general intro rather than getting >> to VirtualBox specifics right away. >> > I also prefer the current order because it would sound like going > backwards in time if we first discuss VirtualBox and then that there > was no virtualization solution for a long time. > > Regards, > Rene OK, no problem ;) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi