From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 14:00:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CD116A402 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 245AD13C45A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 73737 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Mar 2007 14:00:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=dcolWhGHu6htms96biqIAuKDfxTkmBJmgvGSRQ04Ff3vhdhVsBlAk1TP/IlRRlJP9dD5LHIPHc+BnOAuN2idusJcMkcro9BbJnd6i593frYHxxete01+iLv6s08pzpA60iEtXXGSbdctHWSM1H0MIDJAcM55Db2o++ljnPV8SmA=; X-YMail-OSG: wzi4u5YVM1kZ2BusduWzZDRu2C0zPz0ltTz0WEGq Received: from [85.212.45.2] by web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:00:29 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:00:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "R. B. Riddick" To: "Szabó" "Péter" , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <009601c7713f$6b9f2a60$6502a8c0@peteruj> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <299130.71872.qm@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: raid3 is slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:00:31 -0000 Eric wrote: >>> inside: 102400 kbytes in 3.416896 sec = 29969 kbytes/sec >>> >> Looks slow... > > You think so? I think that's pretty acceptable for a UDMA100 device. > Yup... I thought, it was 2MB/sec... Dont know why... 29-55 is good... --- Szabó Péter wrote: > > And what if u try this: > > dd if=/dev/raid3/... of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128 > > ? > > #dd if=/dev/raid3/nmivol of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128 > 128+0 records in > 128+0 records out > 134217728 bytes transferred in 1.555843 secs (86266891 bytes/sec) > OK > > 8KB/transfer is a little low for my taste... Looks like ur copy program > > uses > > 32KB transfers, instead of 128KB transfers... > > > What if u try > > dd if=/source-file/on/raid3-device of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128 > > ? > > dd if=/mnt/vol/site/video/Sissi_2-3/SISSI_2.ISO of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128 > 128+0 records in > 128+0 records out > 134217728 bytes transferred in 6.096775 secs (22014545 bytes/sec) > Hmm... It is still quite slow (the raw device can do about 80MB/sec)... Is it better than with mc? How was CPU-usage / system-load? -Arne ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html