From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 19:04:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA8B16A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:04:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from error404.nls.net (error404.nls.net [216.144.36.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA3743D46 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:04:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ketrien@error404.nls.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (eiterra.achedra.org [192.168.0.100]) by error404.nls.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i98J4YqP041021; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:04:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ketrien@error404.nls.net) Message-ID: <4166E4BE.2060402@error404.nls.net> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:04:30 -0400 From: "Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon , hardware@freebsd.org References: <20041008170717.2728D43D39@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041008170717.2728D43D39@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Monitoring LSI MegaRAID 320-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:04:36 -0000 Simon wrote: >Hello Folks! > >I have several servers with LSI MegaRAID 320-1 controllers. What do >you all use to monitor the arrays? how is one supposed to know when >a drive dies, remotely? I found a utility MegaControl which does exactly >this, but it is buggy and causes my servers to malfunction and start >panicing left and right. I noticed that the array would be reinitialized in background after installing MegaControl which made no sense since the array was already %100 initialized. This would of course corrupt the live system and was probably the cause of panics. > >Any insights on this would be appreciated! > amr(4) provides a cam passthrough function, which exposes the individual drives cleanly. (I've tested this on 320-2 and 320-0.) I'd use camcontrol rather than megacontrol, but bear in mind that, AFAIK, camcontrol cannot tell you the array status, only individual drive status. -Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra | ketrien AT error404 DOT nls DOT net