Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 May 1997 18:20:19 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
Cc:        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>, Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr>, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? 
Message-ID:  <199705150120.SAA23131@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 May 1997 20:07:18 CDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970514195519.311z-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well the nature of their difference lies in  the need to support 
active documents . 

Just post to their mailing list . They seem to be a candid group.

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Amaya/

A few of the key members from the Thot group joined the W3 consortium
and it looks like everyone stands a chance to benefit from the
exchange.

I would start by simply repeating what you posted which addresses
the heart of the issue. 

	Got Sgml 8) (twisted joke on the Milk industries tv AD logo
                     Got Milk!)
	Amancio
>From The Desk Of John Fieber :
> On Wed, 14 May 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > when you get a chance, check out http://rah.star-gate.com/languages.html
> > it discusses the theory of their meta language thingy.
> 
> Hm...  I'm not sure what to think of this.  They seem to have
> expended a great deal of effort to re-invent SGML.  The S
> language implements most SGML concepts, but in an incompatible
> form with no obvious advantage over SGML.  Similarly the P and T
> languages look to be an implementation of the concepts in DSSSL,
> although in a more limited fashion.
> 
> So, the philosophy of Thot is more or less the same as SGML and
> DSSSL almost exactly, but with an independent implementation. 
> DSSSL is quite new (1996), but SGML has been around over a decade
> so I find this re-inventing of the wheel very puzzling and
> somewhat sad. 
> 
> I'll definately have to take a closer look at the code itself
> when I get a chance.
> 
> -john
> 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705150120.SAA23131>