From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 18:51:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF77F16A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:51:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpa6.isomedia.com (outgoing-mail.isomedia.com [66.114.158.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3940643D58 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:51:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chip@wiegand.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tpa6.isomedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBB71CA18D; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpa6.isomedia.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tpa6.isomedia.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29796-07; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:50:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pioneernet.net (mail.pioneernet.net [207.115.64.224]) by tpa6.isomedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926881C8E5B; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:50:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from wiegand.org [66.114.152.128] by pioneernet.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A851862D0096; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:52:01 -0800 Message-ID: <3FF0E835.6050101@wiegand.org> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:51:33 -0800 From: chip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Emmerton References: <3FEE5975.7060104@wiegand.org> <3FEE77BA.4060506@wiegand.org> <20031228102222.N68734@gabby.gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <20031228102222.N68734@gabby.gsicomp.on.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at isomedia.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=999.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SMTPD_IN_RCVD, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA X-Spam-Level: X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: LEVEL= cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:51:02 -0000 Matthew Emmerton wrote: >You sound like you're running 5.x. You will need to install the >compat4x distribution to get FreeBSD-4.x compatibility libraries. > >You sound lik you should be running 4.x anyway -- 5.x is still a strange >mix of "bleeding edge" and "stable" -- but it *is* called -CURRENT for a >reason. > >Matt > > I am running 5.1-release. When I first read your response I thought 'wait a minute - it is a release, so it is stable'. Then I went back and read the info on the web site about 5.1-release. It is a 'release' based on the 'current' 5.0-current. I learned that just becuase it says -release doesn't mean it is based on -stable. Guess I hadn't noticed that before. Anyway, all is working fine now. Thanks. -- Chip