From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 06:05:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4C416A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:05:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5391643D2F; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:05:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3867YFd055432; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:07:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42561E61.1010900@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:02:09 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <23817.1112938371@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <23817.1112938371@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David Schultz cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 geom.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:05:15 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050407234520.GA30206@VARK.MIT.EDU>, David Schultz writes: > > >>>I'm sure that if it is important some developers will jump in and >>>make it better. >> >>This sort of attitude is related to a complaint of a number of >>ports developers and others, namely, that some people refuse to >>fix the things that they break. > > > This is supposed to be a group effort, and that is supposed to mean > that we help each other out. If you demand that kernel developers > fix every single possible implication of their work, our kernel > will not change much in the future. > > Exactly. More code from everyone, less whining. Scott