Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:05:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Steinbach <coco@executive-computing.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: NO_STAGE: Bump PORTREVISION ? Pr class 'change' or 'update' ? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310240931590.54762@probsd.c0c0.intra>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, the 'FAQ on PORTREVISION' discussion found at [1] seems to suggest, that enabling staging does not require a PORTREVISION bump. On the other hand, enabling staging seems to be a change in packaging, although from a users perspective the packaged files don't change. And a change in packaging is said to require a bump in PORTREVISION, according to the referenced thread. When enabling staging, is a maintainer supposed to bump PORTREVISION ? Is this then of class '[maintainer-]update' or just 'change' ? I think putting a hint to that respect on the StageDir Wiki page might help streamline maintainer prs. MfG CoCo [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-March/074120.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1310240931590.54762>