From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 03:36:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2BE106568B for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7925B8FC15 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by uid 399); 18 Nov 2009 03:36:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 18 Nov 2009 03:36:51 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B036BD3.4020900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:36:51 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Kelly References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:53 -0000 Ben Kelly wrote: > On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Ben Kelly wrote: >>> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile: >>> >>> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES} >>> SUBDIR:= ${SUBDIR:N${reject}} >>> .endfor >> Well it seems my search was not exhaustive. >> >> My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can >> look into it. :) > > I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR for the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file using makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system yet. You can add to the mix the fact that options like modules_override and without_modules are documented in make.conf(5) instead of in src.conf(5) which is where (arguably) they should be. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/