From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Mar 18 18:46:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6CD37B719; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (bill.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.2.2]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA48006; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:46:18 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200103190246.VAA48006@cs.rpi.edu> To: Robert Watson Cc: "David E. Cross" , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: idle wonderings about 'struct pcred' In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson of "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:39:05 EST." Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:46:18 -0500 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ahh... Most excellent :) [cost of jail vs. proper abstraction]: *nod*, of course, but if you keep adding on additional auth types like that, the balance will tip. Certainly, the only way this makes any sense is if the goal is to go beyond traditional unix authentication and authorization. Well, so long as this is already in progress... I think I'll just sit back and watch ;) -- David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Lab Director | Rm: 308 Lally Hall Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message