Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1995 19:27:50 -0600 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More nits Message-ID: <199511260127.TAA28662@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <1239.815258519@time.cdrom.com> References: <199511011940.MAA15296@rocky.sri.MT.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <1239.815258519@time.cdrom.com>, Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@time.cdrom.com> wrote: >What I would be willing to do is add the concept of "bonus packs" or >something where there are multiple, aggregated sets of packages loaded >as a group. Anything less than this and there's no reason not to >simply use the package loading menu. Anyone care to suggest some >standard sets? a "gnu bonus pack" with all the "standard" gnu tools would be good. a "tcl/tk bonus pack" is of course required, tcl, tk, tcldp, expect, ... a "gnu developer" pack, with gmake and so on... a "gnu X" pack, ghostview, ghostscript, ... an "X desktop" pack, xfm, xv (if allowed), xpaint, etc... a "mh" pack, with mh, vmail, xmh, ... a "news" pack, with trn, inn, ... an "ISP" pack: mh pack, gnu pack, news pack, webserver, lynx, wuftpd, pine, elm, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511260127.TAA28662>