Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:51:48 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is HEAD broken for anybody else? Message-ID: <20060219145148.GA1065@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060219084102.P74458@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20060219010958.GA22357@flame.pc> <20060219031800.GA19663@flame.pc> <20060219034050.GA20475@flame.pc> <20060219041921.GA62239@flame.pc> <20060219084102.P74458@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-02-19 08:47, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: >On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-02-19 05:40, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: >>>Wrong patch. Then atmconfig will not link. Ignore this please :( >>> >>>>%%% >>>>Index: atmconfig/Makefile >>>>=================================================================== >>>>--- atmconfig/Makefile (revision 16) >>>>+++ atmconfig/Makefile (working copy) >>>>@@ -6,27 +6,12 @@ >>>> # $FreeBSD: src/sbin/atm/atmconfig/Makefile,v 1.8 2005/03/15 07:38:15 >>>> harti Exp $ >> >> The correct fix is probably to add gensnmptree to bootstrap-tools. >> I'm currently building a snapshot with: > > the problem might be that bsnmp currently is removed from the build > because of some miss-import[1]. > > Anyway I haven't seen this problem and no tinderbox because of this. > Are you sure that it's nothing in your local tree? > > [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602140834.k1E8YQRP071616 No local changes are related to bsnmp, as far as I can tell. The only diffs my trunk/src has from the HEAD of ncvs are: http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/diff/keramida-patch-ncvs Other then the large `FLAME' kernel config file, this diff is pretty small to have caused this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060219145148.GA1065>