Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:10:55 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 205789] mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python issue
Message-ID:  <bug-205789-13-695L9GCdoO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205789-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-205789-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205789

neil@darlow.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |neil@darlow.co.uk

--- Comment #3 from neil@darlow.co.uk ---
Can a forced requirement on Python 3 be permitted when there is a ports-wide
default of Python 2.7?

Would this be in violation of some policy?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205789-13-695L9GCdoO>