From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 9 19:56:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA12039 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 19:56:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id TAA12034 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 19:56:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa13072; 9 Jan 97 22:57 EST Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 22:57:13 -0500 (EST) From: Steve To: Doug White cc: Nathan Stratton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.com Subject: Re: News server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Nathan Stratton wrote: > > > > > I am planing on adding to main news servers to feed a network of news > > feeders. I plan on using P5 200 with 256 megs ram and 2 9 gig WSCSI for [snip] > > You would get a real speed increase if you used 5 4GB SCSI disks. Those [snip] Do you or anyone on this list think CCD'ing would make a significant increase in thruput over the 5 4 gig scenario? I have a couple of news servers with multiple same sized drives that were set up before I knew of ccd. Do the benefits outweight the risks if one goes bad?