From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Jul 9 06:08:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D521115D0AF9 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80D680E24 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id d17so19109109qtj.8 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wmDNwjIzJc4ujMHQdAu05HR1gTCa/xnwgBO3EuM6mjI=; b=nZoRWk4ikmIbm3sk3sw/gvAel9TVQacUoWQ3smYCKAXVDkE6uJgjEFXe2cHsQQnk5i UmWX3q+FuQVqfRJ9AUVZBuIr5q0XorhbOX4WBs36jHyuehr2XybiJAnlbt/iKTrbl5qb BbwdvNCLw9JJLJkGVH1ylN4s39Hapm+1nMjQhk8UbB28ukgvAenAIXLwVX9BYaiKLRLZ 6AnPMvq1DPAXEvFCnDryfajUQQaIkcRgIqRBBDRFwyzvyTi0aG+iFptMoC2VTRip/45k obNrx5xVk+bOgbJFmJ7n/k4V8WPzL28St3fBSKqG6FSX9dNlh8d+rsF/uKhUf93U+0k0 OoMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wmDNwjIzJc4ujMHQdAu05HR1gTCa/xnwgBO3EuM6mjI=; b=tFX+yw96A+EmoCDq+mrQ1baEOPYiohIvb2e5c4RGAV7Wirp4EgyjM/BBNz4xSLwwLn 6u52zG2IedXdGGEG/2fFKINzr2yb5EBja9DccTjLX6bInRKjHZme/U3HkRCudv/ip69d aOwlEX8HkPGpPPM7tj59IZjaa2PKCwVbO+9Lgx96aPJwTRaEsXtHtr2HanYPsNEQxNaD giz4yrTXxHGRiNGCbhlh0t5J9RdYJgTI6seGRMMxZRsIrXlae0FOtVYHg+KV++wId2Vb MA5YtxNBqIxjVhF9E0KNHJlNJiGUyjmFYJSLrmCdfJPAZLt6VdrZbHJJNQeiofggHXd6 qS9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVQDVAxRPHHQpPDLZG5PgooQ5vCLdsK04+xWqUJ5ecpLtlGUUQG eGAAXWMI/Pl3+P1wx8qQjfnRvTkH8ndPjUCxeVjcWWr4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaSnkBJi606TYK4JTyGwHx0trIcVWDDPFRBuVhA1i0HXzhGwBKcBqvYRKpQr6SauhDPTOsZ97xcFPqRJTA0sM= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2baa:: with SMTP id m39mr17518730qtm.242.1562652530702; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:08:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20b32c01-03a7-a376-a90f-7f5b8296181a@sentex.net> <201907080637.x686bkG5071904@mailin1.pluspunkthosting.de> <46BA7C85-0BED-4797-98D7-1FC91E2C9EBE@punkt.de> <8ddc52ed-145e-6704-8e00-543b4ee91bff@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:08:39 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RELENG_10 to RELENG11 buildworld no possible ? To: Dimitry Andric Cc: Mike Tancsa , Thomas Mueller , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A80D680E24 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=nZoRWk4i X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-3.01)[ip: (-9.41), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.16), asn: 15169(-2.41), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: ALT1.aspmx.l.google.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.88)[-0.883,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:08:53 -0000 On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 PM Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 8 Jul 2019, at 17:38, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:21 AM Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> On 7/8/2019 3:09 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>>> Am 08.07.2019 um 08:30 schrieb Thomas Mueller : > >>>> Or maybe via 11.2R, if that can be built from RELENG_10? > >>> I just completed a successful build of RELENG_11_2 on a > >>> RELENG_10_4 system =E2=80=A6 > >>> > >>> Kind regards, > >>> Patrick > >> > >> I am guessing all is good up until > >> > >> > >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-11/2019-April/009220.h= tml > >> > >> If I svn update -r346291(commit before the import of the new clang) al= l > >> builds fine. > >> > >> Not sure if its worth a note in UPDATING, or mentioning it here in the > >> google archives will be good enough for anyone else who runs into it. > >> > > > > I think it is worth a note. I'll add one. > > > > We should also followup with dim@ to see why static_assert from > RELENG_10 > > is incompatible with the new compiler, and why it's used in a way that > > would break. > > I took a quick look, but I don't think there is any quick solution. For > some reason, clang 3.4.1 (which shipped with 10.4) cannot handle the > static_asserts which are inside the piece of code in question. Also, > there are several other compilation errors, due to it being unable or > unwilling to cast pointers. > > Upstream LLVM has recently bumped the requirements for building quite > aggressively, it could very well be that a higher version of clang or > gcc is now required to build 8.0, precisely because of the above. At > some point they apparently wanted to drop the workarounds for old > compilers. > Could you look into what the new requirement is? If there's no simple workaround, I'd like to at least document what the minimum is better than I have. Warner