From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 22:10:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E72F16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DA843D39 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1KMAEEN002095 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1KMAEac002094; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:14 GMT Message-Id: <200502202210.j1KMAEac002094@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jose M Rodriguez List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:10:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/74004; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jose M Rodriguez To: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_K=C3=B6nig?= Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:04:54 +0100 El Domingo, 20 de Febrero de 2005 22:28, Bj=C3=B6rn K=C3=B6nig escribi=C3= =B3: > Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > with this logic, why we distribute an /etc/inetd.conf? all > > the entries are commented out. > > It wasn't logic; just an opinion. It's contestable. You didn't > provide logic either, because you claimed that fam is widely used, > therefore let's add an default line to inetd.conf. I suppose this is > much more true as long as we refer to libfam, but this use doesn't > require inetd. Whatever. I think that adding an appropriate line to Both gnome and kde uses libfam, but you must have famd running to get=20 this working. And the documented method to run famd is from inetd. You may easy check that, allthought gnome links with libfam, you really=20 need famd running to get live menu updates. > inetd.conf won't hurt as much as don't do it, but I agree with you > that fam is a good candidate for being added to inetd.conf at this > time. > > > And is less error prone uncomment a line that copy and paste > > while preserve tabs. > > It doesn't matter, because spaces are are valid seperators too. > > Regards Bj=C3=B6rn =2D- josemi