Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:30:20 +0100 From: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@freebsd.org>, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, gecko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r524241 - head/databases/sqlite3 Message-ID: <CAOshKtf=EPFFhXqJRkaA%2BfhRgZL4M6YJZXWWSA-8Xnj_hJVKhg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200127062504.GA47080@FreeBSD.org> References: <202001270533.00R5XDkT049821@repo.freebsd.org> <y2tt-mo7t-wny@FreeBSD.org> <CAOshKteQ%2B_qQRk3mZ8mGmAipnQFuN-LOMEWB42etN-LeJygi_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200127062504.GA47080@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 07:25, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:19:00AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > There is talk upstream of no longer supporting system sqlite in the > > future. > > But that goes against encouraged practices (to avoid bundled libraries), > what's their rationale for going the wrong way? Situations like these. > > > So this might be the best way forward. > > > > What's gecko@'s opinion on this? > > It would be nice if this matter was sorted out *before* bumping of the > port epoch. :-( We had a broken firefox, this required fixing. Adding epoch was the fastest way. > > ./danfe mfg Tobias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOshKtf=EPFFhXqJRkaA%2BfhRgZL4M6YJZXWWSA-8Xnj_hJVKhg>