From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Feb 28 7:10:19 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841037B401 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2852A43FA3 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:10:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 6939 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 15:06:09 -0000 Received: from office.sbnd.net (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (217.75.140.130) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 15:06:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 26481 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Feb 2003 15:08:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:08:53 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Doug Barton Cc: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed Message-ID: <20030228150853.GE907@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Barton , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200302280910.h1S9AdYJ042009@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> <20030228012707.P811@znfgre.tberna.bet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Km1U/tdNT/EmXiR1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030228012707.P811@znfgre.tberna.bet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --Km1U/tdNT/EmXiR1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:30:55AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > INDEX build failed with errors: > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.50_1 >=20 > Errr.... did I do something wrong here? This could be due to the > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-snapshot port having the same PORTVERSION and > PORTREVISION.... Yep, this seems to be the reason. I think a good solution would be changing the snapshot port's PORTNAME to include a '-snapshot' or '-devel' or some similar suffix. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 You have, of course, just begun reading the sentence that you have just fin= ished reading. --Km1U/tdNT/EmXiR1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+X3uF7Ri2jRYZRVMRAmCdAJ9kd6Jpr9Lfvvg1byzwQ/V6I/qphQCfe01b o82HSHtqLswDpImUZeh1cvc= =+h2U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Km1U/tdNT/EmXiR1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message