From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 14:18: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84437B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA05796; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:15:55 +0200 To: Alex Hayward Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <970780555.39dcef8b31450@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:15:55 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Alex Hayward : > KDE doesn't use CORBA. There have also been a number of reports on the > KDE > lists that recent sources have got a lot better performance wise, > including on low end machines. It's really not the right list, and I must admit that I dislike both of them, but it *seems* that KDE runs faster than GNOME. I mean the old KDE. This is strange due to the fact that KDE is C++ and GNOME is C and one would expect the C one to be faster. This hold true for both FreeBSD and Linux I've seen GNOME and KDE on. P.S. Lets not discuss it any further though :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message