From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 9 23:51:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA23467 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 23:51:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA23460 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 23:51:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA05013; Sat, 9 May 1998 23:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd005010; Sun May 10 06:48:53 1998 Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 23:48:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Brandon Lockhart cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smart ifconfig? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG it's not ifconfig rather a combination of tools based either on Kenjiro chen's ALTQ distribution or on Luigi's Dummynet stuff. I'm busy doing something rather similar at the moment here using divert sockets and a daemon. On Sun, 10 May 1998, Brandon Lockhart wrote: > Just wondering if IFCONFIG has been modified yet to support the ability to > limit data sent from each port over a certain device. IE, allow 3mbps to > go over eth0 port 80. Etc. I know there was talk, just wondering if it > was implemented yet. > > > ,----------------------. > | Brandon Lockhart | > `----------,-----------'------------. > | brandon@engulf.com | > `------------------------' > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message