From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 14 16:09:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3151065705 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F618FC17 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from c83-253-252-234.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.252.234]:53053 helo=mx.exscape.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M4dUz-0005WK-4c; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:35 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (macbookpro [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.exscape.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C2BE5D533; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Backman To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20090514133017.362075dhcdy7o2bs@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <08D1E6DF-89D3-4887-9234-C3DB9164D794@exscape.org> <20090514133017.362075dhcdy7o2bs@webmail.leidinger.net> Message-Id: <53311D58-6772-4316-9670-35C4CBB30248@exscape.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:25 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.252.234 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1M4dUz-0005WK-4c. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1M4dUz-0005WK-4c 9a3fa282eb11132dcf7f23aaf5d47f16 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs send -R segfault, anyone else? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:09:40 -0000 On May 14, 2009, at 01:30 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Thomas Backman (from Thu, 14 May 2009 > 11:29:17 +0200): > >> 8-CURRENT checked out yesterday morning (CEST) or so. According to >> the svn-head-list, I *think* no relevant changes has been made >> since then. A search through the archives (gzipped text) shows very >> little about zfs send at all. > > Fix in: > http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-%27zfs-send--R%27-core-dump-%28pr-bin-130105%29-td22106451.html > > Bye, > Alexander. Thanks! I haven't tried it out yet because of some unrelated trouble, but I suppose it'll work. (It figures that's the post is in the Feb archives when I checked May/ April/March!) Although, it makes me wonder... Why aren't trivial patches like this merged to current? I guess half the answer (or perhaps the question) is in the link above, but still... Three months and still the same bug, when a one-line patch exists? Regards, Thomas