From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 17:24:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725EB1065670 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from ks200575.kimsufi.com (ks200575.kimsufi.com [91.121.111.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBE58FC12 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.46] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by ks200575.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 123DFA887 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:07:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 XENHVM Kernel on Xencloud X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:24:22 -0000 Sorry, the from header of the last message was wrong... this is the proper one.... On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote: > Good afternoon, > > The subject practically is saying what I'm trying to ask but... does anyone > tried FreeBSD 8.2 or similar under Cytrix Xenserver or XenCloud?. I have been > doing some benchmarks and seems to perform pretty nice... and seems to be > stable too; the only thing would be nice to be available for FreeBSD at > Xenserver/Xencloud would be the Xenserver/Xencloud's Xentools; although I > assume Xentools are basically for having info of the ip of the machine > (hostname, if the machine has been cloned...) and so... because I assume a xe > migrate and so commands make use of lvm and so... for hot migrations and > so... should work the same way although are not officially supported in the > xenserver/xencloud https api. > > Has anyone ever had some experience with FreeBSD in this environments?. Which > of them?, and which FreeBSD version?. The XenCloud version I tried is > Xencloud 1.0, which makes use of : > > Includes Xen hypervisor version 3.4.2 > Includes Linux 2.6.32 privileged domain > > > Thank you very much. > Good bye!. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >