From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 29 19:21:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB38037B402 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pavilion (user-33qtsp5.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.243.37]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA11342; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:21:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00f401c08a6b$be4fabc0$0101a8c0@pavilion> From: "Richard Ward" To: "Steve Ames" Cc: References: <00c901c08a66$5f1ce3c0$0101a8c0@pavilion> <20010129214609.A61883@virtual-voodoo.com> Subject: Re: BIND 9.1 woes Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:21:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Most likely, though is this a horrific problem? It does not seem to be. = The only thing I am worried about is why I can't launch BIND 9.1 in to = it's own user/group. With previous versions, 'named -u bind -g bind' = would select both perfectly, in 9.1 it appears to have changed and I = cannot quite figure it out. Any ideas? Thanks. Richard Ward mh@maKintosh.com ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Steve Ames To: Richard Ward Cc: Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 9:46 PM Subject: Re: BIND 9.1 woes > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:43:03PM -0500, Richard Ward wrote: > > I just downloaded the BIND 9.1 tarball after hearing about the chaos = with previous versions. I did run into something odd that I can't quite = figure out, it's also mentioned in the 9.1 documentation and I'm sure = some one knows the answer. I managed to start BIND fine, yet digging = through the logs I ran into this line that makes me wonder. > >=20 > > entropy.c:948: unexpected error: > > fcntl(8, F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device > >=20 > > Could some one shed light on this "problem"? Also, when trying to = start=20 > > BIND 9.1, it will start fine as 'named -g', though when I try to=20 > > 'named -u bind -g bind' (so it runs as that user/group) it doesn't=20 > > launch to the background, and fails to start period. Any ideas?=20 > > (Sorry for all the questions, I just moved from 8.X and am still=20 > > getting used to the changes/features) >=20 > This is a known problem under FreeBSD I understand... something about > /dev/entropy being screwy? >=20 > -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message