From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 10:24:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B19416A4CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFECD43D60 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DGwrE-0005Tj-2e; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:25:00 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2VAOjST099484; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:24:45 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2VAOcZ0099428; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:24:38 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:24:38 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ceri Davies , Colin Percival , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050331102437.GA98638@regency.nsu.ru> References: <424B3AAB.6090200@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <20050331101621.GL10485@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050331101621.GL10485@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Adding bsdiff to the base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:24:57 -0000 On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:16:21AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:47:55PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > > I'd like to add bsdiff/bspatch into the base system. I > > initially wrote these as part of FreeBSD Update, but I'm now > > also using them in portsnap, and bspatch has been part of the > > OS X base system for most of the past year as a result of > > being used by their patches. > > My reason for wanting to add this is that portsnap is next > > on my hit list, and I obviously need to get this done first. > > > > Any objections? > > While it's probably easy to guess from the names, can you explain what > they are? I also want to ask if there're enough reasons to bring portsnap and its dependencies into the base. What's wrong with having it in ports? It does not seem to be used/needed for vast majority of our user base, or am I wrong? Thanks! ./danfe