From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Feb 23 17:42:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from ns.uninet.ee (ns.uninet.ee [194.204.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A6D37B401 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:42:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mauri@inspiral.net) Received: from inspiral.net (purupirn.kbfi.ee [194.204.0.113]) by ns.uninet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC8C258C7; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 03:42:51 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <3A97118A.8004FA6@inspiral.net> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 03:42:34 +0200 From: Lauri Laupmaa X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec F950 fibre channel support ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Jacob wrote: > I have some interest in Emulex. However- Emulex (and JNI) has no interest in > FreeBSD- and barely some interest in Linux. If you can convince Emulex or JNI > to be more open with their specs and you can get them to cough up the h/w, I SOme poster at this page: http://slashdot.org/askslashdot/00/11/05/106200.shtml seem to say that there are emulex drivers for linux with source. -- L. Another problem with Linux is that the historically best distributions (such as Debian) have no corporate accountability, while the commercially popular distributions (such as Red Hat) are buggy-as-hell and dumbed-down. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message