From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 12 18:11:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BACB16A400; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao02.cox.net (centrmmtao02.cox.net [70.168.83.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B1A43D46; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by centrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060312181130.BUZU8484.centrmmtao02.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:11:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:13:13 -0600 To: "Makoto Matsushita" References: <20060313.004512.55510725.rushani@FreeBSD.org> <441452E7.3010809@jp.FreeBSD.org> <1142182986.64145.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <4414581B.1070800@jp.FreeBSD.org> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4414581B.1070800@jp.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.52 (Linux, build 1631) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ruby oddity (pthreads) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:11:32 -0000 On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:19:23 -0600, Makoto Matsushita wrote: >> I made threaded ruby the default, because the Gtk+/GNOME bindings for >> Ruby rely on it being threaded. There are some rather nice apps using >> those libraries... But, all they need are ${PTHREAD_LIBS} and it will working w/out enable thread. The ruby-gtk2/ruby-gnome2 aren't alone, it also for ruby-opengl, ruby-sdl, ruby-wx and etc. > Reasonable, so we have to make lang/ruby18 ports to two ports -- one is > for > pthread ruby and another is non-pthreaded ruby. Both ports must be > installed > to the same system without any conflicts. Any volunteers, or we have to > wait > until my superman, nork-san has a free time to do that? :-) No thanks, we used to have ruby18 and ruby18_r, and it was messy and headache. I am the one that suggested to remove and everything was solved by using ${PTHREAD_LIBS} with disable pthread. I would like to see we go back to same way what lofi and I did with ruby before. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2005-February/058420.html > We have another problems here; what is the default ruby, pthreaded or > non-phtreaded. My vote goes to non-pthreaded, since "default to > pthreaded" > may slow for users who doesn't require pthread. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2006-January/084479.html Hopeful either Ruby 1.9 or Ruby 2 will solving all of issues with new thread stuff. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org