Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:19:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217635] lang/beignet: crash in get_program_global_data() after 1.3.0 update Message-ID: <bug-217635-7141-p4GuxQNXN9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217635-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217635-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217635 Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|x11@FreeBSD.org |portmgr@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #20 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- Can portmgr@ land the patch here and backport to 2017Q3 (maybe also 2017Q2)= ? I can't reach an agreement with the maintainer. (In reply to Matthew Rezny from comment #19) > Where is it stated there is blanket approval for any upstream commit? "any" strawman commit doesn't apply. The patch here is both a crash fix + a regression fix + was reviewed. Being "trivial and tested" it satisfies the requirement for "just fix it". https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-announce/2014-January/000= 073.html > Which says OpenCL doesn't work on any version for him? How does this invalidate the *disappeared* crash? Let's not mix different issues. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217635-7141-p4GuxQNXN9>