From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 30 15:30:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E92F37B962 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA52353; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003302330.PAA52353@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Reply-To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: 30 Mar 2000 15:19:52 -0800 * It was me, who was not clear :) No, this time, FreeBSD is the licensee, * who builds the binary out of AT&T's source code and distributes the said * binary. The licensee is not required to present the license to its * users. That's the piece of information I was missing. Thanks. By the way, does that mean that *I* have to read the license every time I build it? (But I don't read all the logs!) * happening. The tarball consists of only 4 files: * * ATTLICENSE ReadMe RunMe RunMe.asc * * To get the source, one needs to run RunMe, which asks to accept a * license. Which is why this is in the post-extract target. Upon * acceptance, it extracts the source code from itself and removes itself. Wow. Very clever indeed. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message