From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 13:29:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA3A152CB for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:28:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18055; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id NAA12818; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902282128.NAA12818@vashon.polstra.com> To: imp@harmony.village.org Subject: Re: gcc In-Reply-To: <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org> References: <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> <199902281648.JAA80190@harmony.village.org> <199902281707.BAA63212@spinner.netplex.com.au> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh wrote: > > BTW, do we need to update binutils? Or are they new enough? I know > that my needs for binutils are covered by the missing bits in the > current version we have in the tree. I'm pretty sure our existing binutils are fine. They're the newest GNU version, and they work OK with the egcs and gcc-2.8.1 ports. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." -- H. L. Mencken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message