From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 7 10: 8:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE9237B421 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:08:23 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g17I88H19448; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Cejka Rudolf Cc: Garance A Drosihn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-ID: <20020207190807.A19376@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20020207101501.A89056@fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020207101501.A89056@fit.vutbr.cz>; from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote (2002/02/06): > > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > in -current. I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message