From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov  3 14:08:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5689DDA
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 14:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (feld.me [66.170.3.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9DD8FC12
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 14:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
 s=blargle; 
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=CSvm3ywj2SLuObWtCn12jUyrIART5Gl0++rH6zNPowI=; 
 b=BSO1oWOz6QhMRZv0DWqv1QA0uweLRe+TemskZwbrGsNDEQpTt2ve96FVaV32bJJ6VbICIxCfndpIqzgvXF46JSEUdS9U1NANPxmzm7nfawWibaGwnBaBq+9lfX75QaJw;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
 by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
 id 1TUeOA-000Gps-5m; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:07:55 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
 with esmtpa id 1351951668-65253-65252/5/14; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:07:48
 +0000
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:08:30 -0500
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO
Message-Id: <20121103090830.0000009d@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <5094184B.6070100@ose.nl>
References: <5093F934.7050306@ose.nl> <5093FD3D.3080201@ateamsystems.com>
 <1351876381.2657.1.camel@mjakubik.localdomain>
 <50940276.5030306@ateamsystems.com> <50940C20.3090409@ose.nl>
 <50940E40.3090709@ose.nl> <5094112C.2070102@ose.nl>
 <20121102184131.GB22755@dft-labs.eu> <5094184B.6070100@ose.nl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:08:05 -0000

On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:00:27 +0100
Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> wrote:

> Though the last 10 years I have not had the inconvenience of having to=20
> deal with long fsck' s or bgfsck' s on servers or workstation installs,=
=20
> so I think this should not be default on new installs.

This is one man's opinion. On the other hand, SUJ by default is a =
godsend for me because of the number of crashes/fscks I've been dealing =
with.